by Six years ago, I wrote a post that reflected my view of the proper relationship between the Fed and the markets: That’s not Bullard’s job. He hasn’t been hired to outguess the markets. If he wants to do that he should go run a hedge fund. His job is to be led around by the markets like a stupid ox with a steel nose ring being dragged along by a farmer. Here’s a Bloomberg headline, reacting to today’s Fed decision: Congratulations, Market. The Fed Is Officially at Your Mercy. So am I ready to declare victory for market monetarism? Not quite. We still need a NGDP market. TIPS spreads and stock market indices are better than nothing, but there’s no substitute for a NGDP futures market. But we are making real progress. The Fed is not using macro “models” to set interest
Topics:
Scott Sumner considers the following as important: Market monetarism, Monetary Policy, NGDP futures targeting
This could be interesting, too:
John H. Cochrane writes Summers tweet stream on secular stagnation
Nick Rowe writes On not “running out of ammo”: Monetary Policy as Farmland Price Policy
John H. Cochrane writes Gold Oped
Stephen Gordon writes What killed real wage growth?
Six years ago, I wrote a post that reflected my view of the proper relationship between the Fed and the markets:
That’s not Bullard’s job. He hasn’t been hired to outguess the markets. If he wants to do that he should go run a hedge fund. His job is to be led around by the markets like a stupid ox with a steel nose ring being dragged along by a farmer.
Here’s a Bloomberg headline, reacting to today’s Fed decision:
Congratulations, Market. The Fed Is Officially at Your Mercy.
So am I ready to declare victory for market monetarism? Not quite. We still need a NGDP market. TIPS spreads and stock market indices are better than nothing, but there’s no substitute for a NGDP futures market.
But we are making real progress. The Fed is not using macro “models” to set interest rates.
Tags: