Tuesday , September 22 2020
Home / Project Syndicate / The Two Faces of Pharaoh

The Two Faces of Pharaoh

Summary:
Hosni Mubarak was an autocratic ruler, under whom radical opposition – especially Islamic – was not tolerated. But his repressive rule was a modest affair compared to that of other Arab leaders, and his maintenance of the peace treaty with Israel delivered real benefits to ordinary Egyptians. JERUSALEM – The Roman historian Sallust remarked that the way states are established determines how they are ruled. This dictum can be applied to individual rulers as well. Moreover, in many cases, the way a ruler’s power ends determines how his rule will be remembered. When China Sneezes Xinhua/Zhang Ailin via Getty Images The

Topics:
Shlomo Avineri considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Timothy Taylor writes An Overview of Emergency COVID-19 Lending from the Fed

Menzie Chinn writes Nonfarm Payroll Employment vs. Trend, Pre-Covid-19

Scott Sumner writes Cochrane on the US as a banana republic

Scott Sumner writes The good, the bad and the horrific

Hosni Mubarak was an autocratic ruler, under whom radical opposition – especially Islamic – was not tolerated. But his repressive rule was a modest affair compared to that of other Arab leaders, and his maintenance of the peace treaty with Israel delivered real benefits to ordinary Egyptians.

JERUSALEM – The Roman historian Sallust remarked that the way states are established determines how they are ruled. This dictum can be applied to individual rulers as well. Moreover, in many cases, the way a ruler’s power ends determines how his rule will be remembered.

This seems to be the case with former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who was deposed in the wake of a massive popular uprising against his rule, which was characterized as authoritarian, oppressive, corrupt, and nepotistic.

To be sure, Mubarak was an autocratic ruler, under whom radical opposition – especially Islamic – was not tolerated. Elections were shams, a hierarchical form of government controlled the population through a plethora of secret services (“the Mukhabarat state”), and the system with which he was identified was anything but...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *