Thursday , September 19 2019
Home / Offsetting Behaviour / Cricket and Collaboration

Cricket and Collaboration

Summary:
Matt Lowe's job market paper coming out of MIT looks excellent. And I love that he markets it with a tweetstream. 🚨 Revised JMP on intergroup contact 🚨Some (me) wondered whether this day would ever come. To celebrate I'd like to tell a story about cricket, caste, and different types of intergroup contact. Are you sitting comfortably?https://t.co/VwMC3ulRj31/N pic.twitter.com/GELj6yRjgM — Matt Lowe (@hmmlowe) August 15, 2019 Sri Lanka has finally finished their first innings in the test against New Zealand, so you've time to give the paper a read: Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration Matt Lowe Abstract I estimate the effects of two types of intergroup contact: collaborative and adversarial. I randomly as-signed Indian men from

Topics:
Eric Crampton considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

Eric Crampton writes Explaining the Outside of the Asylum

Eric Crampton writes Job Openings for Economists – Spotify edition

Eric Crampton writes Drinking Freedom

Eric Crampton writes Morning Roundup

Matt Lowe's job market paper coming out of MIT looks excellent. And I love that he markets it with a tweetstream.
Sri Lanka has finally finished their first innings in the test against New Zealand, so you've time to give the paper a read:
Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration

Matt Lowe

Abstract

I estimate the effects of two types of intergroup contact: collaborative and adversarial. I randomly as-signed Indian men from different castes to participate in cricket leagues or to serve as a control group. League players faced variation in collaborative contact, through random assignment to homogeneous-caste or mixed-caste teams, and adversarial contact, through random assignment of opponents. Collaborative contact increases cross-caste friendships and efficiency in trade, and reduces own-caste favoritism. In contrast, adversarial contact generally reduces cross-caste interaction and efficiency.League participation reduces intergroup differences, suggesting that the positive aspects of intergroup contact in the leagues more than offset the negative aspects in this setting.

What a fun design, and great excuse to get to watch a lot of cricket:
From a sample of 1,261 men, I randomized 800 to play in eight month-long cricket leagues, and assigned the others to a control group.  Of those assigned to play, I assigned 35% to homogeneous-caste teams, and the others to mixed-caste teams.  This randomization gave the first type of cross-caste contact: collaborative – those on the same team shared the common goal of winning matches. Once teams formed, I chose opponents randomly to create the second type of cross-caste contact: adversarial– those on opposing teams had opposing goals. I measured intergroup behavioral outcomes one to three weeks after each league ended.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *