Sunday , April 22 2018
Home / Miles Kimball / Confirmation Bias in the Interpretation of New Evidence on Salt

Confirmation Bias in the Interpretation of New Evidence on Salt

Summary:
[unable to retrieve full-text content]In addition to the link above, for more contrarian discussion of nutrition, obesity and chronic diseases, don't miss:Forget Calorie Counting; It's the Insulin Index, StupidObesity Is Always and Everywhere an Insulin PhenomenonJason Fung: Dietary Fat is Innocent of the Charges Leveled Against ItFaye Flam: The Taboo on Dietary Fat is Grounded More in Puritanism than ScienceSugar as a Slow PoisonKearns, Schmidt and Glantz—Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry DocumentsSalt Is Not the Nutritional Evil It Is Made Out to BeWhole Milk Is Healthy; Skim Milk Less SoHow the Calories In/Calories Out Theory Obscures the Endogeneity of Calories In and Out to Subjective Hunger and EnergyPutting the Perspective

Topics:
Miles Kimball considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Tyler Cowen writes Saturday assorted links

Tyler Cowen writes A Fine Theorem on Parag Pathak, the recent Clark winner

Timothy Taylor writes Most Global Violent Deaths are Murder, Not War

Tyler Cowen writes Ice breaker question

In addition to the link above, for more contrarian discussion of nutrition, obesity and chronic diseases, don't miss:

Permalink

Miles Kimball
Miles Kimball is Professor of Economics and Survey Research at the University of Michigan. Politically, Miles is an independent who grew up in an apolitical family. He holds many strong opinions—open to revision in response to cogent arguments—that do not line up neatly with either the Republican or Democratic Party.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *