Saturday , July 11 2020
Home / FT Alphaville / Is the “science” behind the lockdown any good?

Is the “science” behind the lockdown any good?

Summary:
We should all be pretty familiar with the narrative by now. An arrogant, exceptionalist British government was until mid-March pursuing a reckless strategy of herd immunity that would have callously allowed a huge number of old and vulnerable people to die and the health system to be overwhelmed. Then came a “bombshell” from Imperial College London: a “doomsday report” predicting there would be 500,000 deaths if we were to carry on down that road, prompting a sudden government U-turn, and ultimately the decision to lock the country down. Gone was the Machiavellian Dominic Cummings plan of “letting old people die”; in was STAY AT HOME; PROTECT THE NHS; SAVE LIVES. (The notion that it was Cummings who was pushing for the herd immunity idea has since been disputed, while the notion that

Topics:
FT Alphaville considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Bradford DeLong writes Black: Cracking—Noted

Bradford DeLong writes Campos: The Trump Delusion—Noted

Bradford DeLong writes Higgins & Klitgaard: Japan’s Experience with Yield Curve Control—Noted

Bradford DeLong writes Time for Another Ethics Panel: Keyvan—Noted

FT Alphaville
FT Alphaville is a free daily news and commentary service giving finance professionals the information they need, when they need it. In a world where market professionals are inundated with information there is a pressing need to edit and filter, and hopefully sow a few ideas along the way. That’s where the FT Alphaville team comes in.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *