Ah, I see we share many of the same social characteristics?So yeah, my subconscious is giving you a fast track to validation. Or, perhaps more charitably, I am simply better able to gauge your creditworthiness via “soft” private information? Either way, you can have a loan.That’s a crude summary of a recent paper by Raymond Fisman, Daniel Paravisini, and Vikrant Vig which looked at a large state-owned bank in India where they had access to caste and religious affiliation data, and where, crucially, an “explicit officer rotation policy among branches provides variation in the matching between lenders and borrowers”.With our emphasis:We find strong evidence of preferential in-group treatment. In the baseline results we define two individuals as belonging to the same group when both are members of the same minority religion (Christian, Muslim, Sikh, Parsi, or Buddhist) or, conditional on belonging to the majority religion (Hindu), when both belong to the same official caste (General Class, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, or Other Backward Classes). In our preferred (and most conservative) specifications, we find that on average, the total amount of new loans to borrowers in a group increases by 6.5 percent when the officer assigned to the branch belongs to the same group. Having an in-group officer also increases the number of new loan recipients by 5.
David Keohane considers the following as important: Uncategorised
This could be interesting, too:
Alexandra Scaggs writes Thought for the weekend
Sujeet Indap writes Jonathan Knee explains 25 years of Wall Street’s evolution
Paul Murphy writes The Beaufort sting
Thomas Hale writes The green multiplier effect
Ah, I see we share many of the same social characteristics?
So yeah, my...