In 2012, Robert Gordon famously proposed that growth was stalling because most of the low hanging fruit of innovation had probably already been picked.As the original paper argued:The growth of productivity (output per hour) slowed markedly after 1970. While puzzling at the time, it seems increasingly clear that the one-time-only benefits of the Great Inventions and their spin-offs had occurred and could not happen again. Diminishing returns set in, and eventually all of the subsidiary and complementary developments following from the Great Inventions of IR #2 had happened.If the theory is true, no degree of long-termist investor attitude can arguably turn the trend around.Though, to be clear, Gordon’s innovation slowdown argument went beyond simply a shortage of new ideas. He isolated six
Izabella Kaminska considers the following as important: Uncategorised
This could be interesting, too:
FT Alphaville writes Thought for the weekend
Sujeet Indap writes Should you trust your investment banker to be faithful?
Thomas Hale writes The strange economics of the university strikes
Thomas Hale writes Further reading
In 2012, Robert Gordon famously proposed that...