If you want companies to return less money to shareholders, then you should be able to defend an alternative choice for what they should do instead with their cash.But in times of slow economic growth, all options are problematic. That’s the premise of my On Wall Street column from the Weekend FT, and it’s a direct extension of two earlier posts discussing the idea that investment is as much a function as a cause of weak economic growth. (I think it’s both.)An excerpt:A useful prism through which to understand the issue is to consider the other options themselves in the context of the current recovery — the slowest-growing US expansion of the postwar period.First, a company might use the money for fixed investment, superficially the most pleasing option. But what if opportunities are
Cardiff Garcia considers the following as important: capital investment, Share buybacks, Uncategorised
This could be interesting, too:
Kadhim Shubber writes The former CEO of fallen tech unicorn Ve Interactive has filed for bankruptcy
Matthew C Klein writes What the foreign direct investment data tell us about corporate tax avoidance
Chris Nuttall writes FT Opening Quote – Severn flooded with incentives
Matthew C Klein writes Guest post: Time for a UK sovereign wealth fund
If you want companies to return less money to shareholders, then you should be able to defend...