Monday , October 15 2018
Home / Econbrowser - James Hamilton / You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet

You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet

Summary:
Taxes announced, proposed, on Chinese imported goods. Or, shoot yourself in the foot edition. Source: Hatzius, et al. “The Trade War: Bigger Numbers, Same Conclusion,” GS 5 Oct 2018. With Vice President Pence’s speech, I’m confident that the Trump administration will push forward in implementing fully the programs of imposing tariffs on China sourced imported goods (while still failing to sanction ZTE, …FFS). What are the likely macro impacts. On output, minor, unless stock markets take a dive. On the other hand, consumers will almost certainly face price increases, either relative or general. Source: Hatzius, et al. “The Trade War: Bigger Numbers, Same Conclusion,” GS 5 Oct 2018. On a separate matter, I am compelled to note several inaccuracies and omissions (!) in Mr. Pence’s

Topics:
Menzie Chinn considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Menzie Chinn writes N. Dakota “orphan soybeans” at 236 million bushels

Menzie Chinn writes Guest Contribution: “The New NAFTA”

Scott Sumner writes China should raise the price of Big Macs

Menzie Chinn writes “So China is now paying us billions of dollars in tariffs”

Taxes announced, proposed, on Chinese imported goods. Or, shoot yourself in the foot edition.

You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet
Source: Hatzius, et al. “The Trade War: Bigger Numbers, Same Conclusion,” GS 5 Oct 2018.

With Vice President Pence’s speech, I’m confident that the Trump administration will push forward in implementing fully the programs of imposing tariffs on China sourced imported goods (while still failing to sanction ZTE, …FFS).

What are the likely macro impacts. On output, minor, unless stock markets take a dive. On the other hand, consumers will almost certainly face price increases, either relative or general.

You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet
Source: Hatzius, et al. “The Trade War: Bigger Numbers, Same Conclusion,” GS 5 Oct 2018.

On a separate matter, I am compelled to note several inaccuracies and omissions (!) in Mr. Pence’s panegyric:

When China suffered through indignities and exploitations during her so-called “Century of Humiliation,” America refused to join in, and advocated the “Open Door” policy, so that we could have freer trade with China, and preserve their sovereignty.

I am tempted to extend my remarks, but I will restrain myself, and merely refer people to this book, among many others. Mr. Pence also omits mention of the Exclusion Laws despite the similarities to the administration’s current immigration control framework.

Don’t get me wrong. I believe we are in a multi-faceted competition with China, but tariffs are an ineffective means of countering Chinese economic misbehavior. Nor is rescinding sanctions on ZTE. Nor are tax cuts when we need to fund a military buildup in the Pacific. In other, it’s not clear the Trump administration really has an intent to oppose China, but rather to whip up xenophobic and other less-than admirable inclinations in the electorate.

Menzie Chinn
He is Professor of Public Affairs and Economics at the University of Wisconsin, Madison

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *