Wednesday , August 5 2020
Home / Brad Delong, Berkeley / Four graphs on U.S. occupational segregation by race, ethnicity, and gender

Four graphs on U.S. occupational segregation by race, ethnicity, and gender

Summary:
Cashiers heading the registers at a Walmart in Saugus, Mass., February 2018. Occupational segregation—the disproportionate representation of a group in any type of job—hurts workers and the entire U.S. economy by entrenching racial and gender wage gaps, depressing earnings, and limiting workers’ ability to go into their preferred fields of work. Research shows that differences in education or skills fail to explain a large chunk of persisting job stratification, and that discrimination and longstanding social norms play an important role in preventing workers from being proportionately represented in the U.S. occupational structure. To illuminate the current status of occupational segregation in the United States, below are four graphs that demonstrate the extent to which

Topics:
Kate Bahn, Carmen Sanchez Cumming considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

[email protected] (Cyril Morong) writes The FDA, Masks and Type I & Type II Errors

Scott Sumner writes Taking Trump seriously and literally

Timothy Taylor writes I Surpass Keynes: 33 Years Plus One

[email protected] (Cyril Morong) writes C.E.O.s Are Qualified to Make Profits, Not Lead Society

Cashiers heading the registers at a Walmart in Saugus, Mass., February 2018.
Cashiers heading the registers at a Walmart in Saugus, Mass., February 2018.

Occupational segregation—the disproportionate representation of a group in any type of job—hurts workers and the entire U.S. economy by entrenching racial and gender wage gaps, depressing earnings, and limiting workers’ ability to go into their preferred fields of work. Research shows that differences in education or skills fail to explain a large chunk of persisting job stratification, and that discrimination and longstanding social norms play an important role in preventing workers from being proportionately represented in the U.S. occupational structure.

To illuminate the current status of occupational segregation in the United States, below are four graphs that demonstrate the extent to which workers are crowded into some jobs and have limited access to others along the lines of race and gender, contributing to persistent wage inequality across the labor market. Along with labor market polarization and the rise of insecure and lousy jobs, White men continue to make up the disproportionate majority of workers in top-paying positions, such as CEOs. Conversely, Latinx workers, Black workers, and Asian American or Pacific Islander workers are underrepresented across many of the highest-paying occupations. (See Figure 1.)

Figure 1

From the 1940s to the 1980s, women in general and Black women in particular made big strides toward greater occupational integration, and more Black women entered clerical, management, professional, and technical fields—a process that explains a large share of the wage gains that Black women have made since the 1960s. Around 2000, however, the trend toward greater integration seems to have reversed slightly, and Black women continue to be greatly overrepresented in low-wage service-sector jobs such as in healthcare and retail. (See Figure 2.)

Figure 2

Latino men are overrepresented in many construction occupations, making up 17 percent of the entire industry, while they only represent about 9.3 percent of the U.S. workforce. As measured by the Index of Dissimilarity, which shows how many men or women would need to switch jobs in order to reach the same gender distribution in each occupation as in the overall workforce, Latinx men and women are the most segregated of the major racial or ethnic groups. (See Figure 3.)

Figure 3

Conversely, Asian American or Pacific Islander men and women experience the least gender-based segregation of the major racial or ethnic groups—though they also experience occupational segregation—and have made the greatest advance toward integration. AAPI women in the workforce are also more likely than their Black, Latinx, and White counterparts to work in management or professional fields, with 50 percent of AAPI women employed in those occupations. (See Figure 4.)

Figure 4

Conclusion

Progress toward a less segregated occupational distribution of work in the United States has stalled and, in some cases, reversed in the 21st century. This points to the persisting obstacles many women workers and workers of color face in the U.S. labor market. Striving toward greater integration would foster a more equitable economy and help counteract longstanding U.S. labor market disparities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *