Friday , July 28 2017
Home / Brad Delong, Berkeley / Should-Read: David Anderson: Revisiting Cassidy-Collins

Should-Read: David Anderson: Revisiting Cassidy-Collins

Summary:
Should-Read: David Anderson: Revisiting Cassidy-Collins: “Engagement either leads to burning Senate time if there is no productive grounds for a deal… https://www.balloon-juice.com/2017/05/16/revisiting-cassidy-collins/ …which is a good in and of itself in a normal legislative environment and extremely valuable in today’s climate, or a deal that cements the federal role in healthcare where the argument is over which dial to turn and how far to turn it. That returns healthcare to normal politics and cements a massive ideological victory for liberalism bought at the cost of a tactical policy retreat and giving up the ability for Democrats to use healthcare as a board with a nail on it to beat up on Republicans in the 2018 midterms. Cassidy-Collins is fundamentally a healthcare bill.

Topics:
Bradford DeLong considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Bradford DeLong writes Must-Read: Dylan Scott: The Obamacare repeal debate is now a completely bonkers game of chicken

Bradford DeLong writes Must-Read: Matthew Yglesias: Senate Republicans’ approach to health care is bizarre and appalling

Bradford DeLong writes Should-Read: Mike Bird and Christopher Whittall: The Speech That Transformed European Markets—Five Years Later

Austin Clemens writes Will the United States give up on data collection?

Should-Read: David Anderson: Revisiting Cassidy-Collins: “Engagement either leads to burning Senate time if there is no productive grounds for a deal… https://www.balloon-juice.com/2017/05/16/revisiting-cassidy-collins/

…which is a good in and of itself in a normal legislative environment and extremely valuable in today’s climate, or a deal that cements the federal role in healthcare where the argument is over which dial to turn and how far to turn it. That returns healthcare to normal politics and cements a massive ideological victory for liberalism bought at the cost of a tactical policy retreat and giving up the ability for Democrats to use healthcare as a board with a nail on it to beat up on Republicans in the 2018 midterms.

Cassidy-Collins is fundamentally a healthcare bill. I am still scratching my head at how to make auto-enrollment work with deductibles for a single individual under $10,000 but it is a healthcare bill. The AHCA is a tax cut bill with massive Medicaid cuts attached to it. A few cups of coffee to see if there is a plausible agreement zone by both conservative Democrats in vulnerable seats and Senators who liberals can trust as policy validators are worth drinking…

Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLong is Professor of Economics at the University of California at Berkeley and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He was Deputy Assistant US Treasury Secretary during the Clinton Administration, where he was heavily involved in budget and trade negotiations. His role in designing the bailout of Mexico during the 1994 peso crisis placed him at the forefront of Latin America’s transformation into a region of open economies, and cemented his stature as a leading voice in economic-policy debates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *